Postgres for variable traffic
Neon dynamically scales according to load. Get optimal performance during traffic peaks without overprovisioning.
Variable traffic, fixed costs?
No real-world database has constant demand. To some extent, all modern applications experience variable traffic patterns; for some applications, demand is clearly variable. For example:
- A productivity application might have increased demand during working hours as teams collaborate and complete tasks.
- An AI analytics startup could face heavy processing loads during off-peak hours when batch data jobs are run.
- A gaming platform might experience surges in user activity during evenings when players are most active.
- Online shops might see spikes when certain sales are run… And so on.
Variable load patterns are common, but traditional managed databases require provisioning a fixed amount of CPU and memory. To avoid degraded performance or even outages, it is standard practice to provision for peak traffic, which means paying for peak capacity 24/7 — even though it's needed only a fraction of the time.
Pay only for what you use with Neon
Neon solves this inefficiency via a serverless architecture. By natively separating storage and compute, Neon implements two features that allows you to pay only for the compute you use without investing any manual work: autoscaling and scale to zero.
- Neon autoscales according to traffic, dynamically adjusting CPU and memory as needed.
- Costs are controlled by setting a max autoscaling limit, avoiding unexpected charges.
- Fast performance in production without overpaying. In a typical compute bill, 60% of costs go towards unused resources.
- No manual resizes or downtimes. Neon scales up and down smoothly and immediately.
- Non-prod databases scale to zero when inactive. Instead of paying for compute 24/7, you skim the costs of your supporting databases to a minimum.
- Transparency with open-source architecture. Explore our code in GitHub.
How much money are you wasting on unused compute?
Example deployment in RDS
- 1 production database (db.r6g.8xlarge)Runs 24/7
- Dev databases (db.t4g.micro)Used interminently
- Test databases (db.t3.medium)Used interminently
Input parameters
Deployment
Number of test databases
Number of dev databases
Usage
How many hrs/day are test databases running?
How many hrs/day are dev databases running?
How many hrs/ day do you hit peak traffic?
Dollars overpaid
Bill that could be saved
With scale to zero and autoscaling
Provisioning for peak load is highly inefficient cost-wise, especially taking into consideration that you will most likely be running not only one database instance, but many.
- You'll need at least one production database, but also separate instances for development, testing, and staging.
- Your production database will run 24/7, but only run at peak capacity when you reach peak load.
- Your non-prod databases will only run a few hours per day.
- But for each one of these databases, you'll be paying for peak compute, 100% of the time - even if you don't use it.
Want a price estimation for your particular use case?
Why Neon vs Aurora Serverless
The Neon architecture is inspired in Amazon Aurora, but with some key differences:
- Neon compute costs are up to 75% cheaper vs Aurora Serverless v2.
- Neon scales to zero, Aurora Serverless does not.
- Neon provisions instances in < 1 s, compared to Aurora's up to 20 min.
- Neon uses transparent compute units, vs the ACU abstraction in Aurora Serverless.
- Neon supports database branching with data and schema via copy-on-write, improving development workflows.
- Neon's read replicas don't require storage redundancy, differently than Aurora's.
- Connection pooling is built-in in Neon, vs Aurora's RDS Proxy.